top of page
  • Writer's picturecentedge

The curious case of WebRTC Signaling Servers and the crucial role it plays in a WebRTC application

An interconnected network depicting a signaling server

WebRTC (Web Real-Time Communication) has revolutionized the way we communicate online by enabling real-time audio and video interactions directly in web browsers. Behind the scenes, a crucial component ensures seamless communication between peers: the signaling server. If you are building a WebRTC application, the first server you will need is a Signaling Server. In simple terms, A Signaling server is a server that acts like a middleman that helps in the discovery of users who are interested in speaking to each other by exchanging messages between them. Technically it can implement the discovery and the message exchange mechanism in many different ways. It also can do much more than just discovery and message exchange which can include domain-specific business logic like a whiteboard implementation for e-learning, a prescription writing system for e-health, and a document verification system for e-banking etc. to mention a few. In short, we can conclude that the end-user experience of a video calling system is directly dependent on the robustness and scalability of the Signaling server. Therefore it is super critical to design and develop your signaling server in the right manner from early on so that it would be easy to extend its functionality when such a need arises.

WebRTC Signaling Servers:

Before diving into the signaling mechanisms, let's understand the role of a signaling server in a WebRTC application. Unlike traditional communication systems, WebRTC does not define a signaling protocol. This means that applications need a mechanism to exchange information about session initiation, negotiation, and termination. The signaling server plays a pivotal role in facilitating this exchange of metadata between peers. In this blog post, we'll explore the significance of a signaling server in a WebRTC application and analyze the pros and cons of different signaling mechanisms, including Socket.IO, WebSocket, and Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).

  1. Socket.IO: Socket.IO is a widely used library that enables real-time, bidirectional communication between web clients and servers. It simplifies the development of applications that require real-time updates. In the context of WebRTC, Socket.IO can serve as a signaling mechanism to exchange session details between peers.

  • Ease of Use: Socket.IO is straightforward to implement, making it an excellent choice for developers, especially those familiar with JavaScript.

  • Bi-directional Communication: It allows for real-time, bidirectional communication, which is essential for WebRTC applications.

  • Implementation Difficulty: Easiest to implement with standard javascript knowledge.

  • Overhead: Socket.IO might introduce some overhead due to its features that are not always necessary for signaling in WebRTC.

  • Limited Scalability: In large-scale applications, Socket.IO might face scalability challenges compared to other signaling mechanisms.

  • Disconnections: Due to some design limitations, it faces occasional to frequent disconnections even if the network is stable which makes it difficult to work with large-scale WebRTC applications.

  1. WebSocket: WebSocket is a communication protocol that provides full-duplex communication channels over a single, long-lived connection. It is a low-latency solution, making it suitable for real-time applications like WebRTC.

  • Low Latency: WebSocket offers low-latency communication, making it ideal for real-time applications where timely data exchange is critical.

  • Widespread Support: WebSocket is supported by most modern browsers, ensuring broad compatibility for WebRTC applications.

  • Implementation Difficulty: Moderately difficult to implement with standard javascript knowledge as some core real-time networking knowledge may be required to implement a fault-tolerant scalable solution.

  • Complexity: Implementing WebSocket can be more complex compared to Socket.IO, especially for developers less familiar with low-level networking concepts.

  • Firewall Issues: Some network configurations and firewalls might pose challenges for WebSocket connections, potentially affecting connectivity.

  1. Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): SIP is a signaling protocol widely used for initiating, maintaining, modifying, and terminating real-time sessions that involve video, voice, messaging, and other communications applications and services between two or more endpoints on IP networks.

  • Interoperability: SIP is a standardized protocol, ensuring interoperability across different platforms and devices.

  • Rich Features: SIP supports a wide range of features, making it suitable for diverse communication scenarios.

  • Implementation Difficulty: The most complex to implement among the 3 discussed here. If integration into a telephony network like PSTN is not a requirement, then it is better to avoid SIP for a normal browser-based video calling WebRTC application.

  • Complexity: SIP can be complex to implement, especially for simple WebRTC applications that do not require the full set of features it offers.

  • Overhead: Due to its extensive feature set, SIP might introduce unnecessary overhead for lightweight applications.


In the realm of WebRTC, the signaling server is the unsung hero that ensures smooth communication between peers. Choosing the right signaling mechanism depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the application. Socket.IO, with its simplicity and bidirectional communication, is an excellent choice for many scenarios where the application is not very complex and does not require to scale large. WebSocket, offering low latency, ready to scale big, is suitable for applications where real-time communication is paramount with good fault tolerance along with large scale scalability and where we may not need a fallback mechanism of HTTP long polling in case WebSocket is not available which is the benefit of SIP, with its rich feature set, shines in complex scenarios requiring a standardized protocol for a better interoperability between web based clients and telephony infrastructure.

Understanding the pros and cons of each signaling mechanism empowers developers to make informed decisions based on the unique needs of their WebRTC applications. As the landscape of real-time communication continues to evolve, the role of signaling servers remains indispensable, shaping the future of seamless online interactions using WebRTC.

Feel free to schedule a free consultation using this link if your WebRTC Signalling server/ application is not working as it should be or if you wish to know the correct option for your upcoming use case.


bottom of page